Plaintiffs v. Appropriate Authority (Incometax Department), Mumbai
High Court
20 Apr 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Plaintiffs v. Appropriate Authority (Incometax Department), Mumbai
Date of order
20 Apr 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Plaintiffs v. Appropriate Authority (Incometax Department), Mumbai, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
jmi
1 906B-nms-3404-10
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3404 OF 2010
INSUIT NO. 959 OF 2007.
Jairaj @ Sunil J. Nathwani & Anr.
..Plaintiffs.
vs.
Smt. Arti Selvaraj & Ors.
..Defendants.
And
Appropriate Authority (IncomeTax Department), Mumbai...Respondent.
....
Mr. Vinod Solanki, Mrs. Anila Acharya, i/b. M/s. Tijoriwala & Co., for Plaintiffs.
Mr. Bomi Patel, for Defendants.
....
CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.
DATE : 20TH APRIL 2011.
P.C. :
The learned Advocate appearing for the Plaintiffs on instructions seeks to withdraw the Notice of Motion with liberty to file a fresh Notice of Motion, if so advised.
2.The Notice of Motion is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as sought.
[ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue