In Plaza Investments Pvt.ltd v. The Asstt.commissioner Of, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal.
Decision: Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.608 OF 2001
Plaza Investments Pvt.Ltd. ..Appellant
vs.
The Asstt.Commissioner of
Income Tax ..Respondent
Mr.J.D.Mistri with Mr.P.C.Tripathi i/b Mr.Raj Darak for
appellant.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for respondent.
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ.21stJuly 2008
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ.
S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ.
S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ.
21st
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant
and respondents. It appears that after the above appeal
was admitted, the appellant had also moved the Tribunal by
way of Misc. Application wherein the Tribunal had allowed
rectification petition. In view thereof, the present
appeal has become infructuous. Hence, learned Counsel for
the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal. Appeal
is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Permissible Court fees be refunded to the appellant as per
rules.
(S.J
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) ‘11(Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
KATHAWALLA J.) ‘11(Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.