P.mohanraj v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Corporate Range-1
High Court
01 Jul 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
P.mohanraj v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Corporate Range-1
Date of order
01 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In P.mohanraj v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Corporate Range-1, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: With this, this writ petition stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
W.P.No.5799 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 01.07.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
W.P.No.5799 of 2019
&
W.M.P.No.6629 of 2019
P.Mohanraj
... Petitioner
Vs
1.The Commissioner of Income Tax Corporate Range-1,
Wanaparthy Block, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,
Chennai – 600 034.
2.The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax Corporate Range-1, Wanaparthy Block, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Corporate Range-1, Wanaparthy Block, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,
Chennai – 600 0343.
3.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD) Wanaparthy Block, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,
Chennai – 600 034.
... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the 3[rd]respondent herein dated 22.01.2019 in ACIT (OSD)/AANPM0999H/2018-19, and the consequential proceedings dated 04.02.2019 in AANPM0999H/ACIT (OSD)/2018-19 of the 3[rd] respondent, quash the same and forbear the respondents from initiating any prosecution.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.PothirajFor Respondents: Mrs.Hema Muralikrishnan Sr.Standing Counsel
W.P.No.5799 of 2019
ORDER
The petitioner has challenged a communication dated 22.01.2019 and a subsequent reminder dated 04.02.2019 calling upon the petitioner to pay the self-assessment tax as per his returns of income under the provisions of Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act') in respect of the assessment years 2017-18. No infirmity is pointed out as far as the communications are concerned.
2. The facts in relation to the raising of the demand as well as the subsequent developments as are stated by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, in regard to the company in which the petitioner is a director, being before the NCLT, cannot be looked into in the present proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
3. If at all the petitioner believes that he has a response to make with regard to the self-assessment tax to be paid, he may place the same before the respondents, for their consideration in accordance with law. With this, this writ petition stands dismissed. Connected writ miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.
01.07.2022
nst
Index : Yes / No
Speaking Order / Non Speaking Order
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
To:
1.The Commissioner of Income Tax Corporate Range-1, Wanaparthy Block, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai – 600 034.
2.The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax Corporate Range-1, Wanaparthy Block, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai – 600 0343.
3.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD) Wanaparthy Block, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai – 600 034.
W.P.No.5799 of 2019
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.5799 of 2019
Dr.ANITA SUMANTH, J.
nst
W.P.No.5799 of 2019
&
W.M.P.No.6629 of 2019
01.07.2022
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.