Case LawHigh Court › Pondy Bazar, Chennai 600 017 v. The Comm...

Pondy Bazar, Chennai 600 017 v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai, 120 N.h. Road, Chennai - 34

High Court 24 Feb 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Pondy Bazar, Chennai 600 017 v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai, 120 N.h. Road, Chennai - 34
Date of order
24 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
1997-1998
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Pondy Bazar, Chennai 600 017 v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai, 120 N.h. Road, Chennai - 34, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.02.2020CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARIANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMART.C.A.Nos.501 to 505 of 2010 andT.C.A.No.1476 of 2008 M/s.Janapriya Builders 34, Pondy Bazar, Chennai 600 017. ... Appellant in all TCAs Vs.The Commissioner of Income TaxChennai, 120 N.H. Road, Chennai - 34. ... Respondent in all TCAs Prayer in TCA.No.501 to 505 of 2010:Appeal filed against theorder of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-VI No.121Nungambakkam High Road Chennai 600 034 made in ITA.No.132/07-08,ITA.No.153/06-07ITA152/06-07ITA.No.151/06-07andITA.No.150/06-07 dated 14.10.2008 for the Assessment year 1997-1998, 2000-2001, 2001-2002, 2002-2003 2003-2004 against theorder of the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle I Chennaifor the Assessment year 1997-1998 against the order of JointCommissioner of Income Tax Circle I Chennai for the Assessmentyear 2000-2001 to 2003-2004. TCA.No.1476/2008:Appeal filed against the order of theCommissioner of Income Tax Appeals VI Chennai-34 made inITA.No.75/2000-2001/VI dated 08.06.2001 against the order of theJoint Commissioner of Income Tax Special Range-VII 121, M.G.Salai Chennai 34 made in GIR MO 309-T/97-98/SR-VIII dated27.03.2000. Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that the appealsmay be allowed to be withdrawn. Learned counsel for therespondent Mr.T.Ravikumar does not have any objection. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. Recording the same, these Tax Case Appeals are dismissedas withdrawn. No costs. Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS VI ) /true copy/Sub Asst. RegistrarSglTo1.The Commissioner of Income TaxChennai, 120 N.H. Road, Chennai - 34.2.The Deputy Commissioner of Income TaxCircle I Chennai3.The Joint Commissioner of Income TaxCircle I Chennai4. The Commissioner of Income Tax appeals VIChennai-345.The Joint Commissioner of Income tax Special Range VII, Chennai+1 cc to Mr.T.Ravi kannan Advocate sr15890T.C.A.Nos.501 to 505 of 2010and T.C.A.No.1476 of 2008aa13/05/2020
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan