Ponnaiyah Ramajayam Institute Of Science And Technology Trust (Prist)Rep. Herein By Its Managing Trustee Mr.m.p.nageshwaran,Administrative Office,2/18.4-A, Ramk v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions
High Court
21 Nov 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Ponnaiyah Ramajayam Institute Of Science And Technology Trust (Prist)Rep. Herein By Its Managing Trustee Mr.m.p.nageshwaran,Administrative Office,2/18.4-A, Ramk v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions
Date of order
21 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
2022-2023
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ponnaiyah Ramajayam Institute Of Science And Technology Trust (Prist)Rep. Herein By Its Managing Trustee Mr.m.p.nageshwaran,Administrative Office,2/18.4-A, Ramk v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions, the High Court (2024) decided the matter under Section 246A of the Income-tax Act.
Decision: Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.11.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
W.P. No.35311 of 2024and
W.M.P.No.38211 of 2024
Ponnaiyah Ramajayam Institute of Science and Technology Trust (PRIST)Rep. herein by its Managing Trustee Mr.M.P.Nageshwaran,Administrative Office,2/18.4-A, Ramkripa Apartments,Kasturi Estate First Street,Poes Garden, Chennai 600 086.
... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions),
2nd Floor, May Flower Mid City Building, 1510, Trichy Road, Coimbatore 641 018. 1510, Trichy Road, Coimbatore 641 018.
2. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions),
2nd Floor, May Flower Mid City Building, 1510, Trichy Road, Coimbatore 641 018. 1510, Trichy Road, Coimbatore 641 018.
3. IDFC First Bank,
Rep. by its Branch Manager, Thillai Nagar (West) Branch, Tiruchirapally.
W.P. No.35311 of 2024
4. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)(NFAC), The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi.
... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, with the following prayers :
i) To issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to furnish to the petitioner a copy of the DIN and Notice No.ITBA/COM/F/172024-25/1069754340(1) dated 17.10.2024 issued by the 1st respondent to the 3rd respondent under Section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act.
ii) To issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records in DIN & Letter No.ITBA/COM/F/17/2024-25/1070107756(1) dated 05.11.2024 issued by the 1st respondent to the 3rd respondent, quash the same and further direct the 4th respondent to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2022-2023.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ramakrishnan for ARK Law Associates
For R1, R2 and R4 : Mrs.S.Premalatha
Standing Counsel
ORDER
The writ petition is filed challenging the recovery notice dated 05.11.2024
in DIN & Letter No.ITBA/COM/F/17/2024-25/1070107756(1) whereby the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P. No.35311 of 2024
petitioner's bank account has been attached.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there was an order of assessment dated 26.03.2024 against which an appeal has been filed. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that while the appeal is still pending the impugned recovery notices has been issued whereby the bank account of the petitioner has been attached. A sum of Rs.47,56,547/- is due by way of refund. Furthermore, the learned counsel for the petitioner would also submit that being an Educational Institution the recovery proceeding is causing grave hardship, in running the institution.
3. The learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the appropriate remedy for the petitioner, having availed of the remedy by way of an appeal, is to file a stay application and would also submit that if any stay application is filed the same would be disposed of expeditiously.
4. In view thereof, the petitioner is at liberty to file a stay application in the appeal filed and pending, within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order before the appropriate authority. If any such application for stay is filed the same shall be disposed within 10 days from the date of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis3/6
W.P. No.35311 of 2024
receipt of such application by the appropriate authority, provided that the stay
application is otherwise in order. Till the stay application is filed, the respondent
authority shall not recover any money from the bank account which has been attached.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Speaking (or) Non Speaking OrderIndex : Yes/ NoNeutral Citation: Yes/Nospp
21.11.2024
To:
W.P. No.35311 of 2024
receipt of such application by the appropriate authority, provided that the stay
application is otherwise in order. Till the stay application is filed, the respondent
authority shall not recover any money from the bank account which has been attached.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Speaking (or) Non Speaking OrderIndex : Yes/ NoNeutral Citation: Yes/Nospp
21.11.2024
To:
1. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions),
2nd Floor, May Flower Mid City Building,
1510, Trichy Road, Coimbatore 641 018.
2. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions),
2nd Floor, May Flower Mid City Building,
1510, Trichy Road,
Coimbatore 641 018.
3. IDFC First Bank,
Rep. by its Branch Manager, Thillai Nagar (West) Branch, Tiruchirapally.
4. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)(NFAC),
The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Central Board of Direct Taxes,
New Delhi.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P. No.35311 of 2024
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.spp
W.P. No.35311 of 2024andW.M.P.No.38211 of 2024
11.11.2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.