Pooja Kailash Gupta v. Income-Tax Officer (International Taxation
High Court
26 Aug 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Pooja Kailash Gupta v. Income-Tax Officer (International Taxation
Date of order
26 Aug 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pooja Kailash Gupta v. Income-Tax Officer (International Taxation, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 42-WP 2954-19-corrected.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYDigitallyORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONsigned byNIKITANIKITAYOGESHYOGESHGADGILGADGILDate:2021.09.0810:40:36+0530WRIT PETITION NO.2954 OF 2019
Pooja Kailash Gupta
Vs.
Income-Tax Officer (International Taxation),
Ward 2(3)(1), Mumbai & Ors.
...Petitioner
...Respondents
-------
Mr. Madhur Agrawal with Mr. Fenil Bhatt i/by Mr. Atul Jasani forpetitioner.Mr. Ashok Kotangle with Mr. P.A. Narayanan for respondents Nos.1 & 3.
-------
CORAM:K.R. SHRIRAM &ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.
DATED
:26TH AUGUST 2021
(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)
P.C.:
1.After the Petition was heard for some time, in view of theaverments in Paragraphs 4, 5 and 5.1 of the additional affidavit filed byMr. Vikash Kumar Singh affirmed on 29[th] November, 2019 on behalf ofrespondents, Mr. Agrawal, on instructions, states that petitioner shallprovide the documents, which were submitted by assessee to the bank, torespondents. Respondents may thereafter pass such orders as they deem
fit.
2 42-WP 2954-19-corrected.odt
2.The rights and contentions of petitioner to take such steps asadvised, if they are adversely affected by any further order byrespondents, is kept open.
3.Writ Petition stands disposed.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
( K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue