Poona Ram Choudhary v. Union Of India
High Court
23 May 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Poona Ram Choudhary v. Union Of India
Date of order
23 May 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Poona Ram Choudhary v. Union Of India, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
D.B. Writ Restoration No. 44/2022
In
D.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 17029/2019
Poona Ram Choudhary S/o Lakha Ram Choudhary, Aged About56 Years, Income Tax Officer, Aayakar Bhawan, Jodhpur-342010.
----PetitionerVersus
1. Union Of India, Through The Finance Secretary, Govt. OfIndia, Ministry Of Finance, North Block, New Delhi-110001.India, Ministry Of Finance, North Block, New Delhi-110001.
2. Chairman, Central Board Of Direct Taxes, North Block,New Delhi-110001.New Delhi-110001.
3. Pr. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, C.R. Building,Statue Circle, Jaipur-302005Statue Circle, Jaipur-302005
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s): Mr. T.C.Gupta through VCFor Respondent(s): Mr. Sunil BhandariFor Respondent(s): Mr. Sunil Bhandari
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
23/05/2022
Order
The writ petition preferred by the petitioner was dismissedfor want of prosecution because the counsel representing thepetitioner did not appear to address the Court on 15.3.2022.
Counsel Shri T.C.Gupta, has filed this application forrestoration of the writ petition on the ground that he was notfeeling well on the date fixed by the Court and thus, could notappear to argue the case.
Shri Sunil Bhandari, learned counsel appearing for therespondents does not oppose the restoration application.
Hence, the restoration application is allowed. The WritPetition No.17029/2019 is restored to its original number.
Office to proceed.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J(SANDEEP MEHTA),J
38-RP/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.