Poona Ram Choudhary v. Union Of India
High Court
29 May 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Poona Ram Choudhary v. Union Of India
Date of order
29 May 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Poona Ram Choudhary v. Union Of India, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
D.B. Writ Restoration No. 18/2023
Poona Ram Choudhary S/o Lakha Ram Choudhary, Aged About58 Years, Income Tax Officer, Aayakar Bhawan, Jodhpur-342010.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Finance Secretary, Govt. OfIndia, Ministry Of Finance, North Block, New Delhi-110001.India, Ministry Of Finance, North Block, New Delhi-110001.
2. Chairman, Central Board Of Direct Taxes, North Block,New Delhi- 110001.New Delhi- 110001.
3. Pr. Chief Commissioner Of Income-Tax, C.r. Building,Statue Circle, Jaipur-302005Statue Circle, Jaipur-302005
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
For Respondent(s)
: None
: Mr. Sunil Bhandari
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
Order
29/05/2023
It is noticed that this Court vide order dated 15.03.2022 hasdismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner for want ofprosecution, however, later on the writ petition came to berestored on 23.5.2022 on an application filed by the petitioner.
Again on 1.2.2023 none had appeared on behalf of thepetitioner, therefore, the writ petition was again dismissed forwant of prosecution.
Though the petitioner has moved this application forrestoring the writ petition, yet none is present on his behalf topress the said restoration application.
In such circumstances, we have no option except to dismissthe restoration application No. 18/2023. Hence, the same isdismissed.
(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J
64-Arti/-
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.