Case Law › High Court › Poona Ram Choudhary v. Union Of India

Poona Ram Choudhary v. Union Of India

High Court 15 Mar 2022 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · rhcjodh240618

Parties

Date of order

15 Mar 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Poona Ram Choudhary v. Union Of India, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17029/2019 Poona Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Lakha Ram Choudhary, AgedAbout 53 Years, Inspector Of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhawan,Jodhpur-342010. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India, Through The Finance Secretary, Govt. OfIndia, Ministry Of Finance, North Block, New Delhi-110001.India, Ministry Of Finance, North Block, New Delhi-110001. 2. Chairman, Central Board Of Director Tax, North Block,New Delhi-110001.New Delhi-110001. 3. Pr. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, C.r. Building,Statue Circle, Jaipur-302005.Statue Circle, Jaipur-302005. ----Respondents Connected With D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16827/2019 1. R.k. Bothra S/o Shri Chintamandas, Aged About 53 Years,R/o Income Tax Officer, Aayakar Bhawan, Paota, C-Road,Jodhpur-342010.R/o Income Tax Officer, Aayakar Bhawan, Paota, C-Road,Jodhpur-342010. 2. Shri Ram Meena S/o Shri Mali Ram, Aged About 54 Years,R/o Income Tax Officer, Chittorgarh-312001.R/o Income Tax Officer, Chittorgarh-312001. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Union Of India, Through The Finance Secretary, Govt. OfIndia, Ministry Of Finance, North Block, New Delhi-110001.India, Ministry Of Finance, North Block, New Delhi-110001. 2. Chairman, Central Board Of Director Taxes, North Block,New Delhi-110001.New Delhi-110001. 3. Pr. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, C.r. Building,Statue Circle, Jaipur-302005.Statue Circle, Jaipur-302005. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s): None presentFor Respondent(s): Mr. Sunil Bhandari, Standing Counsel for UOIFor Respondent(s): Mr. Sunil Bhandari, Standing Counsel for UOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI 15/03/2022 Order None present for the petitioners. The Writ Petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J(SANDEEP MEHTA),J 91-92 Mamta/Anshul-

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.