Case Law › High Court › Poona Ram Choudhary v. Union Of India

Poona Ram Choudhary v. Union Of India

High Court 01 Feb 2023 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · rhcjodh240618

Parties

Date of order

01 Feb 2023

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Poona Ram Choudhary v. Union Of India, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, instant writ petition same is dismissed forwant of prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17029/2019 Poona Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Lakha Ram Choudhary, AgedAbout 53 Years, Inspector Of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhawan,Jodhpur-342010. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India, Through The Finance Secretary, Govt. OfIndia, Ministry Of Finance, North Block, New Delhi-110001.India, Ministry Of Finance, North Block, New Delhi-110001. 2. Chairman, Central Board Of Director Tax, North Block,New Delhi-110001.New Delhi-110001. 3. Pr. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, C.r. Building,Statue Circle, Jaipur-302005.Statue Circle, Jaipur-302005. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s) : None present. : Mr. Sunil Bhandari. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI Order 01/02/2023 It may be noted that previously also, the writ petition wasdismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 15.03.2022.However, it was restored on the prayer of the counsel representingthe petitioner. No one is available to pursue the matter when itwas called out. Hence, instant writ petition same is dismissed forwant of prosecution. (RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI),J (SANDEEP MEHTA),J 50-Tikam/-

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.