Pr. Commisshtak v. M/S K.l.a. Fo
High Court
03 Oct 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Pr. Commisshtak v. M/S K.l.a. Fo
Date of order
03 Oct 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commisshtak v. M/S K.l.a. Fo, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITA-167-2023 (
O&M)
Page 1 of 2
136
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJABCHANDIGARH AND HARYANA AT
ITA-167-2023 (O&M)Date of Decision: 03.10.2024
PR. COMMISSHTAK
. . . . Appellant
Vs.
M/S K.L.A. FO
. . . . Respondent
****
CORAM: HHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAEV PRAKASH SHARMA Y VASHISTH
****
Present: Mnfor the appellant/Revenue.
****
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)
1.Counsel for the appellant submits that in teGovernment of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, CentralBoard obearing No.9/2024, the monetarylimits fof Direct Taxes dated 17.09.2024 r filing of the appeals by the department before the ITAT, HighCourt and SLPs before the Supreme Court has been enhanced and theCirculard following steps have been takenwith the No.5/2024 has been amended an purpose to manage litigations:
O&M)
r3. Monetary limits given in egard to filing appeal/SLP shall beincluding those relating to TDS/TCS u1961 with exceptions as per paras 3.5/2024 dated 15.03.2024, where the dshall be taken on merits, without regarparagraph 2 above with applicable to all cases nder the Income-tax Act, 1 and 3.2 of Circular No ecision to appeal/file SLP d to the tax effect and the monetary limits.”
2.The modifications have come into effect from the date of issuance ofCircular i.e. 17.09.2024, and therefore shall apply to SLPs/appeals to befiled before the Supreme Court, High Court and Tribunal and also apply tothe appCourt, High Court and Tribunal,which heals pending before the Supreme ave been directed to be withdrawn. Circular i.e. 17.09.2024, and therefore shall apply to SLPs/appeals to befiled before the Supreme Court, High Court and Tribunal and also apply tothe appCourt, High Court and Tribunal,which heals pending before the Supreme ave been directed to be withdrawn.
3.In view of aforesaid Circular No.09/2024 dated 17.09.2024, as the case doesnot fall within the exception clause of Circular No.5/2024, learned counselprays fonot fall within the exception clause of Circular No.5/2024, learned counselprays fo
4.Accordivswithdrawwithdraw
5.All pendsed as withdrawn accordingly.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE
October 03, 2024
Mohit goyal
1. Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No2. Whether reportable? Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.