Case Law › High Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 Jodhpur...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 Jodhpur, Jodhpur, Rajasthan v. Sushila Modi, Modi Lane, Sirohi, Rajasthan

High Court 13 Feb 2019 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · rhcjodh240618

Parties

Date of order

13 Feb 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 Jodhpur, Jodhpur, Rajasthan v. Sushila Modi, Modi Lane, Sirohi, Rajasthan, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed in light of decisionof this Court in Virendra Modi (supra).

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 160/2018 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 Jodhpur, Jodhpur, Rajasthan ----Appellant Versus Sushila Modi, Modi Lane, Sirohi, Rajasthan ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. K.K. BissaFor Respondent(s): HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA 13/02/2019 Order Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that an appeal preferred by the Revenue against the commonorder dated 21.02.2018 passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur in Income Tax AppealNo.366/JODH/2017 has already been dismissed by this Court videjudgment dated 30.10.2018 in D.B. Income Tax AppealNo.149/2018 :Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Central,Jaipur Vs. Virendra Modi and, therefore, in light of saiddecision, the appeal deserves to be dismissed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed in light of decisionof this Court in Virendra Modi (supra). (DINESH MEHTA),J (SANGEET LODHA),J 23-skm/-

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.