Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 v. Aggarwal Plasto Chem (P) Ltd. Respondentthrough: Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate
High Court
14 Oct 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 v. Aggarwal Plasto Chem (P) Ltd. Respondentthrough: Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate
Date of order
14 Oct 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 v. Aggarwal Plasto Chem (P) Ltd. Respondentthrough: Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
2,3,4
+ITA 783/2015 & CM APPL 22747/2015
PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1 Appellant
Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Senior Standingcounsel.
versus
AGGARWAL PLASTO CHEM (P) LTD. RespondentThrough: Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate.
With
A 784/2015 & CM APPL 22749/2015
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1 Appellant
Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Senior Standingcounsel.
versus
AGGARWAL PLASTO CHEM (P) LTD. ..... RespondentThrough: Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate.
And
+ITA 785/2015 & CM APPL 22749/2015
PR. COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX -1 Appellant
Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Senior Standingcounsel.
versus
ature Not Verified
AGGARWAL PLASTO CHEM (?) LTD RespondentThrough: Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate.
CORAM:DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHARMR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRUORDER%14.10.2015
%
1. Mr. Kamal Sawhney, learned Senior standing counsel for the Revenue
states that on account of the errors in the memorandum of appeals, he needsto withdraw these appeals with liberty to file fresh appeals.
2. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
3. It is made clear that grant of liberty will not be construed as the Court
having expressed an opinion on issues of maintainability and delay in regardVto the appeals that will be filed hereafter.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
OCTOBER 14,2015
mg
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.