Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax 1 v. M/S Ansal Landmark Township Ltd
High Court
17 Aug 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax 1 v. M/S Ansal Landmark Township Ltd
Date of order
17 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax 1 v. M/S Ansal Landmark Township Ltd, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: Recording the said statement, the appeal is disposed of without answering the substantial question of law, which is left open.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~10
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 758/2018 ––PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Anand, Jr. Standing Counsel for Revenue. versus Counsel with Mr. Deepak Anand, Jr. Standing Counsel for Revenue. versus
M/S ANSAL LANDMARK TOWNSHIP LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arta Trana Panda and Ms. Gargi Sethee, Advocates. Through: Mr. Arta Trana Panda and Ms. Gargi Sethee, Advocates.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
%
O R D E R17.08.2018
Counsel for the Revenue/appellants states that the tax effect in the aforesaid case is below Rs. 50,00,000/- and hence in terms of the Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11[th] July, 2018, the appeal may be disposed of without answering the substantial question of law which may be left open.
Recording the said statement, the appeal is disposed of without answering the substantial question of law, which is left open.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
AUGUST 17, 2018 MR
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue