Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Minex Metallurgical Company Ltd
High Court
07 Sep 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Minex Metallurgical Company Ltd
Date of order
07 Sep 2022
Assessment year(s)
2009-10
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Minex Metallurgical Company Ltd, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitallysigned bySHRADDHASHRADDHAKAMLESHKAMLESHTALEKARTALEKARDate:2022.09.0820:43:44+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2570 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-10,Mumbai, Aayakar Bhavan,M.K. Road, Mumbai 400 020... Appellant Vs.Minex Metallurgical Company Ltd.301, Rajguru Apartments,New Nagardas Road,Andheri (East), Mumbai-400 069.AY-2009-10PAN No. : AAACM7315B.... Respondent
****
Mr.Akhileshwar Sharma for appellant.Mr.Atul K. Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.
DATE : 7[th] SEPTEMBER 2022
PC :
1.Learned Counsel for the appellant states that the tax effect
in the present Appeal is below the limit stipulated in terms ofCircular No.17 of 2019, dated 8[th] August, 2019. It is stated that noinstructions have been received from the Department to withdrawthe present Appeal.
2.In the light of Circular No. 17 of 2019, the Appeal is disposedof as involving low tax effect.
3. However, we observe that in case, the Revenue fnds forsome reason that the Appeal was not supposed to have beenwithdrawn in the light of the Circular, dated 8[th] August 2019, itwould be open to the Revenue to fle an application/praecipeseeking restoration of the Appeal, to be decided on its own merits.Refund of Court-fees as per Rules.
[ABHAY AHUJA, J.]
[DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.