Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-10, Mumba...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-10, Mumbai v. Parle Biscuits Pvt Ltd

High Court 29 Jan 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-10, Mumbai v. Parle Biscuits Pvt Ltd
Date of order
29 Jan 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-10, Mumbai v. Parle Biscuits Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3.In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1780 OF 2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-10, Mumbai..Appellant VersusParle Biscuits Pvt Ltd..Respondent ................... Mr. Akhileshkumar Sharma for the Appellant Mr. Sameer Dalal for the Respondent ................... CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 29, 2020. P.C.: 1.Heard Mr. Sharma, learned standing counsel, revenuefor the appellant and Mr. Sameer Dalal, learned counsel forthe respondent - assessee. 2.Mr. Sharma submits on instructions that the tax effectin this appeal is less than the prescribed limit of Rs. onecrore in terms of CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 8.8.2019,being Rs. 61,10,574.00. 3.In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn. 4.Court fees deposited to be refunded as per rules. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] [ UJJAL BHUYAN, J. ]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan