Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10 v. M...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10 v. Medley Pharmaceuticals Ltd.…

High Court 22 Jul 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10 v. Medley Pharmaceuticals Ltd.…
Date of order
22 Jul 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10 v. Medley Pharmaceuticals Ltd.…, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Under the circumstances, these appeals do not surviveand are also dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1463 OF 2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 10 … Appellant VsMedley Pharmaceuticals Ltd.… Respondent With INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1604 OF 2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 10 … Appellant VsMedley Pharmaceuticals Ltd.… Respondent With INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1607 OF 2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 10 … Appellant VsMedley Pharmaceuticals Ltd.… Respondent With INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1610 OF 2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 10 VsMedley Pharmaceuticals Ltd. … Appellant … Respondent WithINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1612 OF 2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 10 … Appellant Vs Medley Pharmaceuticals Ltd.… Respondent ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1290 OF 2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 10 Vs Medley Pharmaceuticals Ltd. … Appellant … Respondent Mr.Akhileshwar Sharma for the Appellant Ms.Shobha Jagtiani with Mr.Ravi R. i/b D.M. Harish Rao for theRespondent in all the matters CORAM: AKIL KURESHI & S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATED: JULY 22, 2019 P.C.: 1.All these appeals involve the same assessee and concern the question of penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer undersection 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal having deleted the quantum additions, as a consequence, had also deltedthe penalty. 2.Today, by a separate order passed in Income Tax AppealNo.510 of 2017 and connected appeals, the Revenue’s appealsagainst the quantum deletions by the Tribunal have beendismissed. Under the circumstances, these appeals do not surviveand are also dismissed. (S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.) (AKIL KURESHI, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan