Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax- 11 v. Shri Inder Pal Singh Wadhawan Through: None
High Court
05 May 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax- 11 v. Shri Inder Pal Singh Wadhawan Through: None
Date of order
05 May 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax- 11 v. Shri Inder Pal Singh Wadhawan Through: None, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: The question sought to be urged by the Revenue is whether the ITAT was correct in law in deleting the addition of Rs.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~7
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 220/2017
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 11 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel
versus
SHRI INDER PAL SINGH WADHAWAN Through: None
..... Respondent
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R% 05.05.2017
1. This is an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) against the order dated 8[th] July, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 1589/Del.2013 for the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2008-2009.
2. The question sought to be urged by the Revenue is whether the ITAT was correct in law in deleting the addition of Rs. 6,30,80,000 made by the Assessing Officer (‘AO’) under Section 40A(3) of the Act. The AO was of the view that the banker’s cheques were not covered under any of the provisions of Rule 6DD of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 and, therefore, disallowed the deduction claimed by the Assessee.
ITA 220/2017
Page 1 of 2
3. The issue has been answered against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee by the order dated 28[th] March, 2017 passed by this Court in ITA No. 260/2017 (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-11 v. Shri Inder Pal Singh Wadhawan.)
4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
MAY 05, 2017 tp
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.