Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12 v. M...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12 v. M/S. Arc Construction Pvt Ltd

High Court 19 Nov 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12 v. M/S. Arc Construction Pvt Ltd
Date of order
19 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12 v. M/S. Arc Construction Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The Income Tax Appeal is,therefore, dismissed. [ M.S.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

R.M. AMBERKAR (Private Secretary) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 438 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - 12..Appellant Versus M/s. ARC Construction Pvt Ltd ..Respondent ................... •Mr. Vipul Bajpayee for the Appellant ................... CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 19, 2018. P.C.: 1.The Revenue has filed this appeal challenging an orderof the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai dated25.5.2015. The sole question urged by the Revenue iswhether Tribunal is right in holding that the amendment inSection 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 isretrospective in its effect. The several High Courts includingDelhi, Calcutta and Gujrat High Court had taken a viewagainst the Revenue. We have also now the judgment of theSupreme Court in the case of Commissioner of IncomeTax Vs. Calcutta Export Company reported in [2018]404ITR 654 (SC) holding that the such amendments are to be treated as having retrospective operation. We additionallynoticed that the Tribunal has in present order relied upon thedecision of the Delhi High Court in the case ofCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Rajinder Kumarreported in 362 ITR 241 which judgment has beenspecifically upheld by the Supreme Court in the case ofCalcutta Export Company (supra). The Income Tax Appeal is,therefore, dismissed. [ M.S. SANKLECHA, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan