Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-14, Mumbai v. Hapag Lloyd Golbal Services Pvt. Ltd
High Court
28 Jun 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-14, Mumbai v. Hapag Lloyd Golbal Services Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
28 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-14, Mumbai v. Hapag Lloyd Golbal Services Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONDigitally signedINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 436 OF 2018URMILAby URMILAPRAMODPRAMODINGALEWITHINGALEDate:2023.07.0610:38:00 +0530
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 439 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-14, Mumbai
Vs.
Hapag Lloyd Golbal Services Pvt. Ltd.
….. Appellant
….. Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar, for Appellant.Mr. Nishant Thakkar a/w Ms. Jasmin Amalsadvala i/b Lumiere LawPartners, for Respondent.
CORAM:K.R.SHRIRAM, J &FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.
DATED :JUNE 28, 2023
P.C.
1.Counsel states post the order dated 16/01/2017 pronounced byITAT, TPO and AO have passed fresh orders accepting comparable given byrespondent and therefore nothing remains in these Appeals and therefore,Appeals would be infructuous.
2.Hence, Appeals dismissed.
3.A copy of the assessment order dated 13/12/2019, for completion ofrecord, is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification.
4.All rights and contentions of the parties are kept open to be taken byRevenue in any other matter.
(FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J)
(K.R.SHRIRAM, J)
Urmila Ingale
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue