Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-14 v. M/S...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-14 v. M/S. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd

High Court 08 Jan 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-14 v. M/S. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd
Date of order
08 Jan 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-14 v. M/S. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 4.The Appeal is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Pradnya Bhogale IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1477 OF 2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-14 ..Appellant vs. M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. ..Respondent …........ Mr. Suresh Kumar for Appellant. Mr. R. Murlidhar I/b. Mr. Atul K. Jasani for Respondent. …........ CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR &M.S.KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 8 JANUARY 2020 P.C.:- Preliminary objection is taken by the Respondent tothe maintainability of the Appeal stating that the order impugnedin this Appeal is not appealable under Section 260(A) of theIncome Tax Act, 1961. A perusal of the impugned order showsthat this preliminary objection is correct. 2.A Miscellaneous Application was filed by the Appellant to set aside the order passed by the Tribunal dismissingthe Appeal on the ground that the approval of the Committee onDisputes was not available with the Revenue. This MiscellaneousApplication has been dismissed by the impugned order on theground that it is made beyond period of four years. 22. itxa 1477-17.doc 3.Therefore, what is challenged before us is an orderrejecting the Miscellaneous Application. There is no Appealmaintainable under this provision for rejection of theMiscellaneous Application refusing restoration of a dismissedAppeal. The Appellant has his own remedies available in law opento challenge the impugned order. 4.The Appeal is accordingly disposed of. (M.S.KARNIK, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan