Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -2, Delhi v. M/S. Cj International Hotels Ltd
High Court
06 Aug 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -2, Delhi v. M/S. Cj International Hotels Ltd
Date of order
06 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -2, Delhi v. M/S. Cj International Hotels Ltd, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Following the view already expressed by this Court in the above decision, this appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
2
+ ITA 334/2019
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -2, DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Vibhooti Malhotra with Mr.Shailendera Singh, Advocates.
versus
M/S. CJ INTERNATIONAL HOTELS LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Mayank Nagi, Advocate.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
O R D E R% 06.08.2019
CM 15153/2019 (delay)
1. For the reasons explained in the application, the delay in re-filing the appeal is condoned and the application is allowed.
ITA 334/2019
2.The Revenue is in appeal against the order dated 16[th] May, 2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No.4496.Del./2016 for the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2012-13.
3. The issue raised by the Revenue is whether the ITAT erred in deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer (‘AO’) as a result of charging the annual letting value of the West Tower under the head ‘income from house property’.
4. As noted by the ITAT in the impugned order this court, the above issue
stands decided in favour of the Assessee by this Court for AY 2011-12 in M/s CJ International Hotels Ltd. v Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Delhi (2011) 197 taxman.com 230 (Del).
5. It is pointed out by the Revenue that a Special Leave Petition was filed against the said judgment. However, no order staying the operation of the said judgment has been shown to this Court.
6. Following the view already expressed by this Court in the above decision, this appeal is dismissed.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
AUGUST 06, 2019 rd
TALWANT SINGH, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.