Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Kolhapur v. Rajendra Babulal Malu
High Court
29 Jan 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Kolhapur v. Rajendra Babulal Malu
Date of order
29 Jan 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Kolhapur v. Rajendra Babulal Malu, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1728 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Kolhapur..Appellant VersusRajendra Babulal Malu..
..Respondent
...................
Mr. N.N. Singh for the Appellant
Mr. Sameer Dalal for the Respondent Mr. Sameer Dalal for the Respondent
...................
CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN &
MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 29, 2020.
P.C.:
1.Heard Mr. Singh, learned standing counsel, revenue for
the appellant and Mr. Sameer Dalal, learned counsel for therespondent - assessee. respondent - assessee.
2.Mr. Singh submits on instructions that the tax effect inthis appeal is less than the prescribed limit of Rs. one crorein terms of CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 8.8.2019, beingRs. 80,34,000.00.
3.In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn.
4.Court fees deposited to be refunded as per rules.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] [ UJJAL BHUYAN, J. ]
Digitallysigned byRavindraRavindra M.AmberkarM.Date:Amberkar2020.01.3011:12:50+0530
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue