In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Bausch & Lomb Eyecare India Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
48. + ITA 292/2017
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2
..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel.
versus
BAUSCH & LOMB EYECARE INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shashwat Bajpai and Mr. Sharad Agarwal, Advocates. Through: Mr. Shashwat Bajpai and Mr. Sharad Agarwal, Advocates.
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R% 17.04.2017
1. The issue raised by the Revenue in the present appeal stands covered by
the decision of this Court in Bausch & Lomb Eyecare (India) (P) Ltd. v.
ACIT (2016) 381 ITR 227.
2. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
S. MURALIDHAR, J
APRIL 17, 2017/dn
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.