Case Law › High Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Bhar...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Bharti Airtel Ltd

High Court 06 May 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

06 May 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Bharti Airtel Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 19. + ITA 297/2016 & CM No.16768/2016 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 ..... Appellant Through: Mr P. Roy Chaudhuri, Senior Standing counsel and Ms Luxmi Gurung, Junior Standing counsel with Mr Aamir Aziz, Advocate. versus BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. ..... Respondent CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R% 06.05.2016 CM No. 16768/2016 (for condonation) 1. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. 2. The application stands disposed of. ITA 297/2016 3. Learned counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw this appeal and the application. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn. S.MURALIDHAR, J MAY 06, 2016/MK VIBHU BAKHRU, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.