Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S. Bechtel India Pvt. Ltd

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 1. + ITA 379/2016 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P. Roy Chaudhuri, Senior Standing counsel. versus M/S. BECHTEL INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Piyush Kaushik, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R% 21.07.2016 CM No.24523 of 2016 (exemption) 1. Allowed subject to all just exceptions. ITA No. 379 of 2016 2. In this appeal only two substantial issues have been urged by the Revenue against the order dated 21[st] December 2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 1478/Del/2015 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2010-11. 3. Question (A) concerning the direction to the Assessing Officer (‘AO’) to include certain companies for consideration of the Transfer Pricing Officer (‘TPO’) as a comparable while excluding certain other companies which were considered by the TPO stands covered by decision of this Court dated ITA No. 379/2016 Page 1 of 2 12[th] May 2016 in ITA No. 283 of 2016and ITA No. 303 of 2016 (Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-Delhi-2 v. Bechtel India Ltd.) in the Assessee’s own case for AYs 2004-05 and 2005-06. 4. As far as question (B) concerning the adjustment for interest no receivables, the Court finds that the ITAT has returned a detailed finding of fact that the Assessee is a debt free company and the question of receiving any interest on receivables did not arise. Consequently, no substantial question of law arises for consideration as far as this issue is concerned. 5. The appeal is dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR, J JULY 21, 2016 mg NAJMI WAZIRI, J ITA No. 379/2016 Page 2 of 2