Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -2 v. Tata Sons Limited
High Court
13 Jan 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -2 v. Tata Sons Limited
Date of order
13 Jan 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -2 v. Tata Sons Limited, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 19. itxal 1445-19.doc 3.In the above view, the present appeal is disposed of interms of the above Circular.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
DDR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1445 OF 2019
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -2..Appellant
vs.Tata Sons Limited
..Respondent
…........
Ms. Vaibhavi Gala i/b. Mr. Charanjeet Chanderpal for appellant.
…........
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR &M.S.KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 13 JANUARY 2020
P.C.:-
On the last date, we had adjourned this appeal at theinstance of the learned counsel for the Revenue to takeinstructions to withdraw this appeal in terms of Circular No. 17 of2019 dated 8 August 2019 issued by the Central Board for DirectTaxes (CBDT).
2.Today, the learned Counsel appearing in support ofthe appeal state that in spite of best efforts, no instructions areforthcoming from the Revenue. Learned counsel stated that thetax effect involved in this appeal is less than the threshold limit ofRs. 1.00 crore as provided in the CBDT Circular dated 8 August2019.
19. itxal 1445-19.doc
3.In the above view, the present appeal is disposed of interms of the above Circular. Refund of Court fees as per Rules.
4.However, it is made clear that in case the Officers ofthe Revenue inform the learned counsel for the Revenue that thisappeal is not covered by the above CBDT Circular dated 8 August2019, then the parties are at liberty to move this Court for recall ofthis order in respect of this appeal.
(M.S.KARNIK, J.)
(NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
DigitallyDikshasigned byDiksha RaneDate:Rane2020.01.1517:09:11+0530
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.