Case Law β€Ί High Court β€Ί Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-22Mumbai...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-22Mumbai – 400 012 v. Dalchand H. Gupta

High Court 17 Sep 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· newos
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-22Mumbai – 400 012 v. Dalchand H. Gupta
Date of order
17 Sep 2018
Assessment year(s)
β€”
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-22Mumbai – 400 012 v. Dalchand H. Gupta, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Decision: Kumar, these appeals are disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below β€” read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order β€” as passed by the High Court

suresh IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.317 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-22Mumbai – 400 012 Vs. Dalchand H. Gupta .... Appellant .... Respondent AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.375 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-14, Mumbai – 400 020 Vs. M/s. Avendus Capital Pvt. Ltd. .... Appellant .... Respondent AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.412 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-16, Mumbai – 400 020Vs.Wadia Ghandy & Co. .... Appellant .... Respondent AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.429 OF 2016 Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Mumbai-400 012 Vs. M/s. The Santacruz Residents Association .... Appellant .... Respondent Page 1 of 2 Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant in all Appeals.None present for the Respondent in ITXA-317/2016.Mr. Ashish Mehta i/by Khaitan & Co. for the Respondentin ITXA-375/2016. None present for the Respondent in ITXA-412/2016.Mr. Mandar Vaidya for the Respondent in ITXA-429/2016. CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 17, 2018 P.C: 1.Mr. Suresh Kumar states that he has received instructions from Senior Revenue Official not to press theseappeals because of the low tax effect. In view of theseinstructions received by Mr. Kumar, these appeals are disposed of as withdrawn. However, we clarify that the questionsproposed by the Revenue in these appeals are kept open forconsideration in an appropriate case. 2.Refund of Court fee as per rules. (B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) Digitally signedby SureshJagdish SajnawatDate: 2018.09.1915:20:19 +0530 Page 2 of 2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
βœ… File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) β†’ πŸ’¬ Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β€” not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press Β· Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
Β© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP Β· LLPIN ACN-4920 Β· Jaipur, Rajasthan