Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -23, Mumb...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -23, Mumbai v. Sanjay Ahuja

High Court 17 Jan 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -23, Mumbai v. Sanjay Ahuja
Date of order
17 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -23, Mumbai v. Sanjay Ahuja, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
R.M. AMBERKAR (Private Secretary) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1100 OF 2018 ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1651 OF 2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -23, Mumbai.. Applicant In the Matter Between: Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -23, MumbaiVsSanjay Ahuja ................... •Ms. Padma Divakar for the Applicant ................... .. Appellant .. Respondent CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 17, 2019. P.C.: 1.Heard. 2.Through this Motion, the applicant seeks condonationof delay of 112 days in taking out this Motion for settingaside the order dated 19.4.2018 passed by the Prothonotoryand Senior Master under Rule 986 of the High Court OriginalSide Rules. 3.We have perused the afÏdavit in support and aresatisfied with the reasons indicated therein for the delay in preferring this Motion as well as for not removing ofÏceobjections in time. 4.In the above view, the Notice of Motion is allowed interms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). [ M.S. SANKLECHA, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan