Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-23 v. Parvez Mohammad Hussain Ghaswala

S.S.Kilaje IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1645 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-23..Appellant Versus Parvez Mohammad Hussain Ghaswala..Respondent ................. Mr.Sham Walve a/w. Mr.Pritish Chatterji for Appellant.Mr.Sham Walve a/w. Mr.Pritish Chatterji for Appellant.Ms. Aasifa Khan for Respondent.Ms. Aasifa Khan for Respondent. ….............. CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : MARCH 3, 2020. P.C. : 1.Heard Mr.Sham Walve, learned standing counselrevenue for the appellant and Ms. Aasifa Khan, learnedcounsel for the respondent-assessee. 2.On 29.01.2020, the following order was passed: “2. It is seen that dispute claim in the appeal is Rs.3,24,209.00 as per own statement made by the appellant.appellant. 3. Mr.Sham Walve, learned standing counsel, revenue to obtain instructions from the department as to whether this case is covered by CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 8.8.2019.” 3.Today, when the matter is called upon, Mr. Walve,learned standing counsel fairly submits that the tax efect inthis appeal is Rs.3,24,209.00 which is well below theprescribed limit for fling of appeal before the High Court bythe Income Tax Department in terms of CBDT Circular No. 17of 2019 dated 08.08.2019. 4.In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn. 5.Court fee to be refunded as per rules. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] [ UJJAL BHUYAN, J. ]