Case Law › High Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-26, Mumba...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-26, Mumbai v. Anil Pranlal Bajaria (

High Court In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

—

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-26, Mumbai v. Anil Pranlal Bajaria (, the High Court decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL(IT) NO. 740 OF 2018 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-26, Mumbai....APPELLANTSV/S Anil Pranlal Bajaria (prop. Apara Enterprises)....RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGHTHAKUR &THAKUR & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA, JJ29th July, 202229th July, 2022 DATE : P.C. : Due to paucity of time, stand over to 04/08/2022. Interim order, if any, tocontinue till then.Due to paucity of time, stand over to 04/08/2022. Interim order, if any, tocontinue till then. ( ASSOCIATE )

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.