In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-29 v. Mr.navin J. Doshi, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Subject to removal of all office objections withina period of eight weeks from today, the order passed by theProthonotary & Senior Master dated 4 January 2019 is set aside.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
urmila IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 820 OF 2019
ININCOME TAX APPEAL ST. NO. 1919 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-29
Vs.
Mr.Navin J. Doshi
… Applicant
… Respondent
Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Applicant.Ms.Aasifa Khan, for Respondent.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M. S. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 19 DECEMBER, 2019.
P. C. :
We have perused the affidavit in support of Notice ofMotion. Sufficient cause is made out by the Applicant to condone thedelay in filing the Notice of Motion. Delay in filing the Notice ofMotion is condoned. Subject to removal of all office objections withina period of eight weeks from today, the order passed by theProthonotary & Senior Master dated 4 January 2019 is set aside. Ifoffice objections are not removed within eight weeks from today, theearlier order will stand revived.
2.Notice of Motion is accordingly allowed.
[M. S. KARNIK, J.] [NITIN JAMDAR, J.]
1/1
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue