Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2Vs.kishco Ltd v. Of 2018 And 2470 Of 2018
High Court
23 Mar 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2Vs.kishco Ltd v. Of 2018 And 2470 Of 2018
Date of order
23 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2Vs.kishco Ltd v. Of 2018 And 2470 Of 2018, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitally signedUDAYby UDAYSHIVAJIJAGTAPSHIVAJIDate:2022.03.30JAGTAP19:02:57+0530
- Chitra Sonawane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2982 OF 2018WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2957 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2Vs.
.. Appellant .. Respondent
NRB Bearings Ltd.
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1084 OF 2014WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2108 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2
.. Appellant .. Respondent
Vs.Pentagon System and Services Pvt. Ltd.
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2291 OF 2018WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2470 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2Vs.New Consolidated Construction Comp. Ltd.
.. Appellant .. Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1368 OF 2019
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2Vs.Kishco Ltd.
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
.....
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant Ms. Priti V. Shukla for the respondent in ITXA 2982 of 2018Ms. Aasifa Khan for the respondent in ITXA 1084 of 2014 and ITXA 2108 of 2018Mr. Subhash S. Shetty a/w Mr. Hiro Rai for the respondent in ITXA
2291 of 2018 and 2470 of 2018
…...
CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM &
N.R. BORKAR, J.J.
DATED : 23[rd] MARCH, 2022
P.C.
1.Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for appellant, on instructions,prays to withdraw these appeals.prays to withdraw these appeals.
2.All appeals dismissed as withdrawn.
3.Refund of Court fees in accordance with the Rules.
(N.R. BORKAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue