Case Law › High Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, New De...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, New Delhi v. Federal Mogul Goetze India Ltd. (Earlier Knownas Goetze India Ltd

High Court 26 Oct 2018 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

26 Oct 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, New Delhi v. Federal Mogul Goetze India Ltd. (Earlier Knownas Goetze India Ltd, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~15 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ITA 24/2018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3, NEW DELHI ..... AppellantThrough:Mr. Asheesh Jain, Senior StandingCounsel with Mr. Dushyant Sarna,Advocate. Versus FEDERAL MOGUL GOETZE INDIA LTD. (EARLIER KNOWNAS GOETZE INDIA LTD.)..... Respondent Through:Mr. Satyen Sethi, Advocate with Mr.Arta Trana Panda, Advocate. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIO R D E R%26.10.2018 Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that the taxeffect in the present appeal is below Rs. 50,00,000/- and hence interms of Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018, the appeal may bedisposed of without answering the issues or questions raised.Wemay clarify that the issues and questions raised in the present appealare left open. Taking the statement on record, we dispose of the presentappeal without examining the issues and questions which are leftopen.Liberty is also granted to the appellant-revenue to file an application for revival of the appeal in case matter is covered by anyexception. SANJIV KHANNA, J ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J OCTOBER 26, 2018/p’ma

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.