Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. Dreamland Buildtech P. Ltd Through Ms Monika Ghai, Advocate
High Court
02 May 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. Dreamland Buildtech P. Ltd Through Ms Monika Ghai, Advocate
Date of order
02 May 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. Dreamland Buildtech P. Ltd Through Ms Monika Ghai, Advocate, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
28.
+ ITA 286/2016
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3 ..... Appellant Through Mr Ashok K. Manchanda, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Vibhooti Malhotra, Junior Standing Counsel.
versus
DREAMLAND BUILDTECH P. LTD Through Ms Monika Ghai, Advocate.
..... Respondent
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R% 02.05.2016
CM 15856/2016
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
-CM 15855/2016 & 15857/2016 (Condonation of delay in filing and re
filing the appeal)
2.For the reasons stated in the applications, the delays in filing and re-filing the appeal are condoned.
3. The applications are disposed of.
ITA 286/2016
4. In the light of the order passed by this Court on dated 26[th] April, 2016 in
ITA 286/2016 Page 1 of 2
ITA 829/2015, ITA 886/2015 & ITA 908/2015 (Pr. Commissioner of
Income Tax, Central -3 v. Dreamland Build Tech P. Ltd), no substantial question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
MAY 02, 2016 pkv
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
ITA 286/2016 Page 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.