Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -4, New Delhi v. Innus Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd
High Court
27 Nov 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -4, New Delhi v. Innus Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
27 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
2013-14
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -4, New Delhi v. Innus Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the aforesaid factual and legal position, no substantial question of law arises in the present appeal and the same is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~37
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 1328/2018
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -4, NEW DELHI
..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel.
versus
INNUS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through:
%
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R
27.11.2018
Issue raised in this appeal pertains to disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962.
2. Innus Infrastructure Private Limited during the period relevant to Assessment Year 2013-14 had earned exempt dividend of Rs.5,13,581/-. The assessee had themselves disallowed an amount of Rs. 5,61,464/- under Section 14A of the Act.
3. The Assessing Officer, however, invoked Rule 8D to enhance the disallowance to Rs.2,63,55,878/-.
4. The issue raised by the Revenue is covered against them by several decisions of this Court, the latest being ITA No. 725/2018, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-6 New Delhi versus Macdonald’s India
Private Limited dated 22[nd] October, 2018. In view of the aforesaid factual and legal position, no substantial question of law arises in the present appeal and the same is dismissed.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
NOVEMBER 27, 2018 MR/VKR
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.