Case LawHigh Court › Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax 4 New Delh...

Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax 4 New Delhi v. M/S Ncr Vehicles Pvt Ltd

High Court 30 Jun 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax 4 New Delhi v. M/S Ncr Vehicles Pvt Ltd
Date of order
30 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax 4 New Delhi v. M/S Ncr Vehicles Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Decision: 4.We, accordingly, and on this short score alone allow the instant appeal and set aside the order dated 30 June 2023.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 725/2023 PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4 NEW DELHI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, SSC with Ms. Madhavi Shukla and Ms. Naincy Jain, JSCs. versus M/S NCR VEHICLES PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor, Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, Mr. Tarun Chanana and Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Advs. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR O R D E R % 07.03.2025 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 30 June 2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [“Tribunal”] and in terms of which the appeal of the Revenue has come to be dismissed. 2.The appeal itself pertains to Assessment Year [“AY”] 2011-12. We find from a reading of the order of the Tribunal that the appeal has come to be perfunctorily disposed of in the following terms: - “3.Brief facts of the case are that the assessee company is engaged in the business of retail trading of cars & operating as authorized service centre of Ford cars. The assessee filed return of income on 14.09.2011 declaring an income of Rs. 27,95,262/. The AO made addition of Rs. 13.61 Cr. and sales as per the profits and loss account of Rs. 83.62 Cr. 4.The reconciliation of the same has been examined in detail by the ld. CIT (A) and deleted the addition. We have examined and found that the difference is on account of: 5.Therefore, the decision of the ld. CIT (A) to delete the addition made by the AO is hereby affirmed.” 3.As is ex-facie evident, the Tribunal has not even attempted to engage with the grounds of appeal which were addressed for its consideration or to examine the issues which were canvassed. Since the order is totally non-speaking, it cannot possibly be sustained. 4.We, accordingly, and on this short score alone allow the instant appeal and set aside the order dated 30 June 2023. The appeal shall, consequently, stand revived on the board of the Tribunal to be decided afresh and in accordance with law. 5.All rights and contentions of respective parties on merits are kept open. YASHWANT VARMA, J. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.MARCH 07, 2025/nd
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan