Case Law › High Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 Through...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 Through v. Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate

High Court 17 Apr 2017 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

17 Apr 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 Through v. Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeals are accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 10 and 11 + ITA 755/2015 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 Through versus ..... Appellant Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate GULBARGA ASSOCIATES (P) LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr. Prakash Kumar and Ms. Rashmi Singh, Advocates With + ITA 756/2015 PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 Through ..... Appellant Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate versus GULBARGA ASSOCIATES (P) LIMITED Through ..... Respondent Mr. Prakash Kumar and Ms. Rashmi Singh, Advocates CORAM:JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R% 17.04.2017 1.The issues raised by the Revenue in these appeals are answered against it and in favour of the Assessee by the decision of this court in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. Nikki Drugs and Chemicals P. Ltd., (2016), 386 ITR 680 (Del). 2. The appeals are accordingly dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR, J APRIL 17, 2017/b NAJMI WAZIRI, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.