Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 } v. M/S. Renfro India Pvt. Ltd. }

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 672 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-5}AppellantversusM/s. Renfro India Pvt. Ltd.}Respondent Ms. Padma Divakar for the appellant. Ms. Neha Anchalia I/b. M/s. ArgudPartners for the respondent. CORAM :-S. C. DHARMADHIKARI &B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.DATE :- OCTOBER 10, 2018 P.C. :- 1.Ms. Divakar, on instructions, states that the Revenue maybe allowed to withdraw this appeal. It is withdrawn in the light ofthe circular issued by the Revenue which determines the limit ofmonetary sums or the sum above which alone the appeals of theRevenue are to be pressed. Every appeal involving a summentioned below this limit would not be pressed and on theRevenue's request, the court may dismiss it as withdrawn. 2.We have found that the Revenue is withdrawing the appeal on its own. It is for the Revenue to decide and withdraw theappeals based on its circular, but we clarify that we have Page 1 of 2 expressed no opinion on the questions of law nor on the legality and validity of the circular. 3.By clarifying as above, the appeal is allowed to bewithdrawn and stands disposed of as such. JayantVishwanathSalunke Digitally signed byJayant Vishwanath(B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)SalunkeDate: 2018.10.1118:09:34 +0530