Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6, New De...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6, New Delhi v. Maruti Suzuki India Limited (Successor Of Suzuki Powertrain India Limited

High Court 09 Jan 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6, New Delhi v. Maruti Suzuki India Limited (Successor Of Suzuki Powertrain India Limited
Date of order
09 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6, New Delhi v. Maruti Suzuki India Limited (Successor Of Suzuki Powertrain India Limited, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 18/2018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6, NEW DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Gunjan Varshney, DGT 16(1), Circle-VI, Delhi. versus MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED (SUCCESSOR OF SUZUKI POWERTRAIN INDIA LIMITED) ..... Respondent Through: Mrs. Kavita Jha, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R% 09.01.2018 The Revenue’s appeal in this case questions the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’). The Tribunal had ruled that the assessment made, in the name of Suzuki Power Train India Limited, was a nullity since the entity was no longer in existence and was subjected to an approved scheme for amalgamation; the transferee company was amalgamated with Maruti Suzuki India Limited. This Court notices that for A.Y. 2011-12, on the same facts, the assessment was held to be invalid – a decision, that was ultimately upheld by this Court in the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-6, New Delhi vs. Maruti Suzuki India Limited (Successor of Suzuki ITA 18/2018 Page 1 of 2 Powertrain India Limited, (2017) 397 ITR 681 (Del.). For the same reasons, no question of law arises in this case. The appeal is therefore dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J JANUARY 09, 2018 nn A. K. CHAWLA, J ITA 18/2018
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan