Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6, New De...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6, New Delhi v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd

High Court 21 Jan 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6, New Delhi v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd
Date of order
21 Jan 2020
Assessment year(s)
2004-05
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6, New Delhi v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Mr.Vohra, learned senior counsel for the respondent-assessee points outthat the only question raised by the revenue-appellant in the present appealrelates to the stage at which the customs duty drawback would accrue asincome i.e., whether in the year of export or when the order is passed by theappro...

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed in view of the decision rendered bythis Court in ITA No.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~11 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +ITA 17/2018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6, NEW DELHI ..... Appellant Through:Ms.Lakshmi Gurung, Senior StandingCounsel with Ms.Talha A.R. andMr.Siddharth Gupta, Advocates. versus MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. ..... Respondent Through:Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocatewith Ms.Kavita Jha and Ms.DevikaJain, Advocates. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAO R D E R % 21.01.2020 1. Mr.Vohra, learned senior counsel for the respondent-assessee points outthat the only question raised by the revenue-appellant in the present appealrelates to the stage at which the customs duty drawback would accrue asincome i.e., whether in the year of export or when the order is passed by theappropriate authority. He points out that this issue is covered by the earlierdecision of this Court in the case of respondent-assessee in ITA No.397/2009 decided on 07.05.2017 for the assessment year 2004-05. 2. The present appeal is directed against the remand order. The appeal hasbecome infructuous since the issue/question itself has been answered in favour of the assessee. Learned counsel for the appellant does not disputethe aforesaid position. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed in view of the decision rendered bythis Court in ITA No. 397/2009 decided on 07.05.2017. VIPIN SANGHI, J JANUARY 21, 2020v SANJEEV NARULA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan