Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6, New Delhi v. M.s. Shoes East Ltd

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 273/2017 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6, NEW DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Vikrant A. Maheshwari, Advocate versus M.S. SHOES EAST LTD. Through: None ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R% 09.05.2017 1. This is a penalty appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) against an order dated 20[th] September, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 946/Del/2013 for the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2001-02. 2. Against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) affirming the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer, the Assessee went before the ITAT, which, by the impugned order, deleted the penalty. 3. What weighed with the ITAT was that there was no actual concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income by the Assessee. The Assessee was found to have made a few claims which are found not allowable. That, by itself, could not lead to an inference as regards the concealment of income. The view taken by the ITAT based on the decision of the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income-tax, Ahmedabad v. Reliance Petroproducts P. Ltd. [2010] 322 ITR 158 (SC) is a plausible view to be taken. 4. No substantial question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR, J MAY 09, 2017 tp CHANDER SHEKHAR, J