Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6, New Delhi v. Noslar International Ltd. Through: None
High Court
12 Sep 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6, New Delhi v. Noslar International Ltd. Through: None
Date of order
12 Sep 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6, New Delhi v. Noslar International Ltd. Through: None, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~3
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
ITA No. 729/2017
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6, NEW DELHI
..... Appellant Through: Mr.Asheesh Jain, Sr.Standing Counsel.
versus
NOSLAR INTERNATIONAL LTD. Through: None.
..... Respondent
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
%
O R D E R12.09.2017
1. The Revenue is in appeal against the order dated 23[rd] January 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No. 251/Del/2014 pertaining to the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2010-11.
2. The question sought to be urged in the present appeals is whether the ITAT was justified in confirming the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [‘CIT(A)’] which deleted the addition of Rs. 1,90,91,323/- made under Section 68 of the Act?
3. On the facts of the present case, the Court is satisfied that the CIT (A) undertook a detailed analysis of the facts and the evidence on record before coming to the conclusion that the addition made by the Assessing Officer
ITA 729/2017
(AO) requires to be deleted. Therefore, in the facts and circumstances of the present case, the Court does not find that any substantial question of law arises for consideration from the impugned order of the ITAT concurring with the order of the CIT (A).
4. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
SEPTEMBER 12, 2017 ‘anb’
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.