Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax- 6 v. Media Transasia India Ltd. Through : None

$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 3/2017 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 6 ..... AppellantThrough : Sh. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel, for the Revenue. versus MEDIA TRANSASIA INDIA LTD. Through : None. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ..... Respondent O R D E R09.01.2017 % The Revenue in this appeal urges three questions of law – with respect to expenditure of `17,66,407/- towards prior periods and `2,24,23,100/- as capital expenditure on account of the assessee’s contribution to the joint venture. It was urged that the disallowance to the extent of `2,16,78,914/-, inter alia by treatment of a larger amount as capital expenditure, was also justified. The Revenue furthermore relies upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in Brooke Bond India Limited v. CIT, Calcutta 1997 (10) SCC 362 as far as the addition of `1,10,300/- is concerned and contends that legal expenses were not in the nature of commission as held by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). This Court is of the opinion that the first two questions sought to be urged, i.e. treatment of `17,66,407/- and disallowance of `2,16,78,914/-, are essentially factual. Moreover, the findings of the authorities are concurrent on this. With respect to the surviving question, i.e. treatment of `1,10,300/-, whilst the Revenue’s contentions appear justified, the tax effect is far below the prescribed limit. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed as unmerited. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J JANUARY 09, 2017/ajk NAJMI WAZIRI, J