Case Law › High Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. Noki...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. Nokia India Pvt. Ltd

High Court 22 Oct 2024 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

22 Oct 2024

Assessment year(s)

2009-10

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. Nokia India Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3.Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed on account of low tax effect.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 854/2016 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC with Mr. Anant Mann, JSC. versus NOKIA INDIA PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit Mangal & Ms. Radhika Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRUHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA O R D E R22.10.2024 % 1.The Revenue has filed the present appeal impugning the order dated 03.06.2016, passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No.1870/DEL/2010 for the assessment year 2009-10. 2.At the outset, the learned counsel appearing for the Revenue states that the tax effect involved in the present appeal is below the threshold limit of ₹2,00,00,000/- as stipulated in the Circular dated 17.09.2024. 3.Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed on account of low tax effect. VIBHU BAKHRU, J OCTOBER 22, 2024/at SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J Click here to check corrigendum, if any

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.