Case Law › High Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. Noki...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. Nokia Solutions & Networks India Pvt. Ltd.(Formerly Known As, Nokia Siemens

High Court 04 Dec 2017 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

04 Dec 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. Nokia Solutions & Networks India Pvt. Ltd.(Formerly Known As, Nokia Siemens, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 4.The Appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

$~39 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ITA 1095/2017 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 ..... Appellant Through :Mr Sanjay Kumar and Mr RahulChaudhary, Advocates. versus NOKIA SOLUTIONS & NETWORKS INDIA PVT. LTD.(FORMERLY KNOWN AS, NOKIA SIEMENS ..... Respondent Through :Mr Deepak Chopra, Mr AmitSrivastava and Mr Ankul Goyal,Advocates for NOKIA. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHATHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVAO R D E R %04.12.2017 1.The Revenue is aggrieved by the extension of stay granted by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for six months periodbeyond a one year period. 2.This aspect is covered against the Revenue in Pepsi FoodsPrivate Limited versus Union of India (2015) 376 ITR 87 (Del).Private Limited versus Union of India (2015) 376 ITR 87 (Del). 3.The Court is of the opinion that there is no substantial question of law. 4.The Appeal is, therefore, dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J DECEMBER 04, 2017/‘Sn’ SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.