In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 6 v. Satyanarayan R. Agarwal, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is disposed of aswithdrawn. [ SARANG V.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
R.M. AMBERKAR (Private Secretary)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 241 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 6..Appellant
Versus
Satyanarayan R. Agarwal
..Respondent
...................
•Mr. Sham Walve for the Appellant
...................
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 19, 2019.
P.C.:
1.Learned counsel for the Revenue has filed an afÏdavitdated 14.3.2019 of one Mr. Ashok Kumar Pandey, PrincipalCommissioner of Income Tax for making a correct declarationof tax effect involved in this appeal.
2.Learned counsel submitted that the tax effect involvedin the appeal is below the minimum threshold prescribed inCBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018. He seekspermission to withdraw the appeal on that ground.
3.Permission granted. Appeal is disposed of aswithdrawn.
[ SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue