Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -7, Delhi v. Quippo Oil & Gas Infra Ltd
High Court
05 Aug 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -7, Delhi v. Quippo Oil & Gas Infra Ltd
Date of order
05 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -7, Delhi v. Quippo Oil & Gas Infra Ltd, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: The issue sought to be urged by the Revenue is whether the Assessee could be equated with mineral oil concerns and could be allowed depreciation at a higher rate i.e.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~68
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 720/2019
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -7, DELHI ..... Appellant
Through: Mr.Raghvendra Kishore Singh, Senior Standing Counsel for the Revenue.
versus
QUIPPO OIL & GAS INFRA LTD.
..... Respondent
Through: Ms.Kavita Jha and Mr.Anant Mann, Advocates.
CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH O R D E R% 05.08.2019
1. This is an appeal against an order dated 18[th] December, 2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No.5709/Del/2014 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2007-08.
2. The issue sought to be urged by the Revenue is whether the Assessee could be equated with mineral oil concerns and could be allowed depreciation at a higher rate i.e. 60%? It may be noted that the Assessee here is supplying equipment on hire to other mineral oil concerns.
3. The Court is informed that this issue has already been decided against the Revenue by this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. HLS India Limited (now HLS Asia Limited) 2011 355 ITR 292 (Del). The said decision was affirmed by the Supreme Court by the dismissal of the Revenue’s SLP (C) 2723/2012 by order dated 6[th] February, 2012.
4. No substantial question arises. The appeal is dismissed.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
AUGUST 05, 2019
mr
TALWANT SINGH, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.