Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax 7, Delhi v. Replika Press Pvt. Ltd
High Court
01 Nov 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax 7, Delhi v. Replika Press Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
01 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax 7, Delhi v. Replika Press Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of on account of low tax effect i.e. below Rs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~4.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 829/2019
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 7, DELHI..... Appellant Through: Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Advocate. versus
REPLIKA PRESS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K. Sampath and Mr. S. Krishnan, Advocates. Through: Mr. K. Sampath and Mr. S. Krishnan, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R% 01.11.2019
Learned counsel for the respondent points out that tax effect in the present case is less than Rs. 1 crore. He has tendered in Court the demand notice issued in pursuance of the impugned order, which is for Rs.61,57,310/- inclusive of interest.
Mr. Singh has checked up the matter and he does not dispute this position. He points out that in the appeal, the tax effect has been disclosed as Rs. 1.2 crore.
The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of on account of low tax effect i.e. below Rs. 1 crore. However, in case, the appellant finds that the tax effect is more than Rs. 1 crore, the appellant shall be entitled to seek revival of the appeal on that ground.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
NOVEMBER 01, 2019/kd
SANJEEV NARULA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.