Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -7 v. Pci Ltd
High Court
18 Mar 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -7 v. Pci Ltd
Date of order
18 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -7 v. Pci Ltd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.The appeal fails and shall stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~91
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 189/2024 & CM APPL. 16744/2024
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -7 ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC with Ms. Deeksha Gupta, Adv. Ms. Deeksha Gupta, Adv. versus
PCI LTD
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor, Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Mr. Tarun Channa, Advs. Lalchandani, Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Mr. Tarun Channa, Advs.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R
% 18.03.2024
1.The Commissioner seeks to impugn the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [“ITAT”] dated 01 February 2023 and has proposed the following question for our consideration:-
“2.1 Whether the Ld. ITAT is right in holding that provisions of section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act,1961 are not attracted in the case of loan and advances received pursuant to business transaction?”
2.We note that the ITAT while dismissing the appeal has taken note of the contents of the sanction letter of the Punjab National Bank dated 27 November 2010 to uphold the view taken by the CIT(A) to the effect that the lending facility obtained was pursuant to business transactions and would thus not fall within the ambit of Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The view so taken merits no interference.
3.The appeal fails and shall stand dismissed.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.MARCH 18, 2024/neha
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.